Monday
January 12, 2026
Home Blog Page 24

Putin’s Easter Truce, A PR Stunt Draped In Hypocrisy, A 30-Hour Peace To Distract From 3 Years Of War? Why Putin’s Easter Ceasefire May Be A Gift-Wrapped Deception

In a move that stunned diplomats and observers alike, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a sudden, unilateral Easter truce in the ongoing war on Ukraine. But Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy isn’t buying it, and perhaps, neither should the world.

As air raid sirens blared across Ukrainian cities and Iranian-made Shahed drones buzzed ominously in the skies, Zelenskyy called out the farce for what it appears to be: “Another attempt by Putin to play with human lives.” The violence never really stopped, he insisted. Nor did the artillery fire. In fact, the only thing that seems to have changed is the packaging, this time wrapped in the holy veneer of Easter.

And yet, the world is expected to believe in the sincerity of a regime that has weaponized winter, bombed hospitals, and now wants a pause, for humanitarian reasons?

A Ceasefire Born in Chaos, Not Compassion

The so-called Easter truce, barely 30 hours long, was announced out of the blue. No negotiations, no coordination, no mutual agreement. Just a decree from Moscow, imposed as if peace can be declared like a public holiday. The brevity, the unilateral nature, the timing, seem to be conveniently aligned with growing pressure from Washington, make it all feel more like a geopolitical stunt than a sincere step toward peace.

In fact, the truce came mere hours after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and President Donald Trump signaled they wanted to see tangible signs that the Kremlin was ready to talk peace. Putin delivered, if you can call it that. But it smells more like a tactical nod to Trump’s base than a true humanitarian gesture.

Let’s not forget – this is not the first time. In January 2023, Moscow made a similarly hollow declaration during Orthodox Christmas, which was widely seen as a strategic pause to regroup troops. Déjà vu!

The Weaponization of Peace

Could Putin be playing a small game, announce the truce, then accuse Kyiv of violating it. That way, the it can be twisted to suggest Ukraine, and by extension, its Western allies, do not want peace. A tactic – one that exploits religious sentiment and weaponizes the very idea of diplomacy.

Russia’s Ministry of Defence posted on Telegram: “The ceasefire regime is being introduced for humanitarian purposes… provided that it is mutually observed by the Kyiv regime.” That conditional clause says it all. The so-called “truce” is a trap. A stage set to shift blame, not to stop war.

Meanwhile, Ukraine did not even agree to the terms. How can you have a ceasefire when only one side signs up?

Diplomacy Takes a Hit

In reality, this maneuver could do more harm than good. It muddles the already delicate global diplomacy and peace negotiations. It gives false hope to the naïve and ammunition to the opportunistic. Worse, it could corner Ukraine into an impossible position, damned if they fire back, damned if they don’t.

Trump may hold it up as proof that Putin is “willing” to negotiate. Pro-Kremlin pundits might use it to argue that Kyiv is the aggressor. But the facts on the ground, of drones, missiles, and artillery fire, tell a very different story.

Easter Ceasefire, Russia, Ukraine, Putin

Words vs. Warheads. Can You Really Trust Putin’s Truce When Missiles Keep Falling?

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha put it straight – “Putin’s word cannot be trusted,” he said flatly, and who could argue?

Ukraine, according to Sybiha, had unconditionally agreed to a U.S.-backed 30-day interim ceasefire as early as March, and what did Moscow do – it rejected it. Now, Putin shows up with a 30-hour PR ceasefire, wrapped in the Easter card and expects the world to clap.

It’s the classic Kremlin playbook –  say one thing, do another, and accuse the other side of hypocrisy. Just hours after Putin announced his sudden humanitarian heart, Russian media reported over 100 Ukrainian violations of the truce.

Meanwhile, Ukraine says Russia’s been violating ceasefires all along, lobbing drones and missiles like confetti.

Let us break it down – 
On Saturday night alone, eight missiles and 87 drones were launched by Russia.
That’s not a “pause.” That’s a barrage.

Ukraine’s air defence systems managed to intercept 33 drones and redirect 36 more using electronic warfare, but damage was still reported across five different regions. And this was supposed to be the “Easter truce”?

Ceasefires Shouldn’t Come with Missile Strikes

The question then becomes – who is Putin really talking to?

According to Hanna Shelest of Ukrainian Prism, it’s not Kyiv, it’s Trump.

“This has more to do with Donald Trump’s comments than any real intent to stop the war,” she said. The Kremlin, she added, believes it can manipulate Washington more easily than Berlin, London or Paris.

And that’s exactly what this stunt looks like –  a strategic photo op, not a peace offering. Putin’s claim that Russia has “always been ready for negotiations” is undermined by the missiles still flying and drones still buzzing.

As one analyst put it, “Everyone here feels this is simply a way for Vladimir Putin to carry out a publicity stunt and buy some time with the White House.” And yet again, Russia says one thing, does another.

A Ceasefire Under Fire

Despite all this, Ukraine hasn’t abandoned diplomacy. In fact, the only constructive thing to come out of this moment was a prisoner swap, one of the few acts both sides actually followed through on. Russia and Ukraine exchanged 246 prisoners each, brokered by the United Arab Emirates. Ukrainian President Zelenskyy announced that 277 Ukrainian service members had returned home and expressed gratitude to the UAE for mediating.

But even in the middle of a war, even during a ceasefire full of caveats and contradictions, Ukraine isn’t letting its guard down. As Shelest noted, “Ukraine is ready and will try to have [a ceasefire], but Ukraine has to be on high alert because previous experiences have demonstrated we cannot relax.”

Putin's Ceasefire | Cartoon Movement

So, What Exactly Is This Ceasefire?

A publicity move? A message to Trump? A way to reframe Ukraine as the “spoiler” in global media while continuing the war machine behind the scenes?

What’s Putin Really Playing At With This “Easter Ceasefire”?

On the surface, Vladimir Putin’s sudden call for a 30-hour Easter truce in Ukraine may seem like an oddly timed olive branch. But in geopolitics, nothing is ever that simple, especially not with the Kremlin. When Moscow moves, it’s never just about what’s visible. It’s about the ripple effects. The timing, the symbolism, and the strategic undercurrent all scream of a deeper agenda. So what’s really going on?

1. A Tactical Breather Disguised as a Spiritual Pause

Let us be blunt, Russia’s army needs a breather. After months of slow, grinding offensives and manpower challenges that have led to whispers of potential third-wave mobilization, a brief, staged ceasefire gives Russia a chance to regroup without openly retreating.

Whether it’s rotating exhausted troops, resupplying units under pressure, or fortifying recently taken ground without Ukrainian counter-battery fire, a one-day “humanitarian” ceasefire provides just enough cover to shuffle the deck without drawing too much suspicion. And if Ukraine fires back during this pause, Russia gets to spin the story of Kyiv being the aggressor.

2. Feeding Trump’s Narrativem and Splitting the West?

Again, let us not ignore the elephant in the room –  Trump’s rhetoric has been, to put it mildly, warmer toward Moscow than toward NATO. By offering a carefully timed but flawed truce just after comments from Trump and Marco Rubio calling for signs of peace, Putin throws a bone to the MAGA camp, and in doing so, subtly drives a wedge between Kyiv and some elements in Washington.

This move puts Zelenskyy in a diplomatic bind. If Ukraine rejects the ceasefire or is seen to violate it, Trump-aligned voices can turn around and say, “Look, we gave peace a chance, and Kyiv didn’t take it.” In other words, Putin doesn’t need the ceasefire to work. He just needs the optics.

3. A Signal to China, the UAE, and the Global South

With the West largely united against Russia, Putin is increasingly looking East and South to build new alliances or maintain neutrality among major powers like China, Iran and North Korea in particular. Gestures like a “humanitarian” ceasefire, no matter how short or shaky, allow the Kremlin to claim moral high ground in international forums and conversations.

4. Propaganda Fuel for the Domestic Front

Another factor that should be considered is that inside Russia, state-controlled media is great with storylines. And this ceasefire plays perfectly into the Kremlin’s portrayal of Putin as the “reluctant warrior” – a man who seeks peace, but is constantly provoked by Kyiv and its NATO backers.

5. Buying Time, Testing Reactions

This move may also be a trial balloon – to see how the U.S., Ukraine, Europe, and other global powers react to a micro ceasefire. It’s a temperature check; if any part of the Western coalition blinks or bites at the prospect of further pauses, it gives Moscow room to negotiate from a stronger hand, or at least pretend to.

Also, if Russia is planning a major operation or anticipating one from Ukraine, such symbolic moves offer a distraction or a delay, muddying intelligence signals and giving Putin just enough time to reposition assets. A 30-hour ceasefire is not long enough to change anything on the ground, but it’s just long enough to change the story.

In geopolitics, even peace can be weaponized.

Aviation Safety & Profitability and Probability using Digital Transformation: A Use Case

2

By: Colonel Harpreet Singh Jaiswal (Retired)

Aviation Safety: source Internet

According to the International Air Transport Association’s (IATA) Annual Safety Report 2023 Executive Summary, accidents have reduced by 61% over the last decade. Barring one fatal crash of 2023, the year enjoyed the lowest fatality risk rate of 0.03 per million route sectors. This translates to roughly one accident in about 8.8 lakh flights. This is due to aviation stakeholder’s willingness to, earnestly investigate accidents to improve safety while, undertaking aggressive research and development (R&D). However, every now and then, we still come across news of flight disruptions. These disruptions can be categorised primarily into three areas: Equipment or sub-assembly failure, turbulence related in-flight injuries and accidents and lastly, misadventures by unruly passengers.

Whatever be the cause of the disruption, it leads to unforeseen expenses in terms of urgent public relations management exercises, legal penalties, increased unscheduled maintenance costs and of course, the loss of goodwill. In addition, the airline’s public relations officers or corporate communicators often have to work in overdrive to salvage the airline’s reputation.

 Today, digitization which includes the Internet of Things (IoT), coupled with modern testing technologies, has advanced to such an extent that, it is possible to minimise the damage caused by the aforementioned factors. While these risks can never be completely eliminated, they can be minimised through digital transformation by the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI), rapid broadband digital communication and super fast computing for data analytics, amongst other tools.

The advancements in aircraft’s diagnostic through R&D, destructive and nondestructive material testing and a concentrated effort by all aviation stakeholders to find the root cause of any failure, have improved aviation safety and minimised losses caused by black swans.

The current era of digitization integrates artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things (IoT), machine learning, data analytics, fast computing and reliable signal transmission, to process inputs from diverse fields in order to improve operational safety and reduce human errors in civil aviation.

This has been made possible by the quick capture of real- time data from the sensors of airborne aircrafts, meteorological balloons carrying radiosondes, satellite imagery and wind or weather measurement stations. These sensors generate large volumes of data, known as big and fast data. This data is quickly collected, collated, segregated and processed using customised algorithms run by super computers that apply artificial intelligence and machine learning as operational resources to deduce actionable insights for reducing bottom lines.

Digitization also enables this raw and refined data to be sent in near real-time to aircrafts while they are in flight. These insights are also utilised in evaluating and optimising preventive maintenance schedules, managing turbulence complexes (which can lead to increased flying time due to flight path deviations), reducing fuel burn and carbon footprints.

 As far as managing unruly air passengers is concerned; a neural network analysis of social media data footprints generated by the public is used to identify potential troublemakers who might misbehave inflight. Such individuals increase aviation costs by necessitating the deployment of air marshals, cause flight disruptions, incurring legal and public relations or corporate communication expenses due to their misbehaviour.

The as far as the third factor mentioned in the above disrupters ie equipment failure; material failure rates have been minimised due to digitisation and systematic R&D. Consequently, injuries due to material failure are the least likely to occur in an aircraft today. Turbulence related flight disruptions and their associated costs are more plausible and profound.

 An aircraft consists of various assemblies and sub-assemblies. These components have undergone extensive testing, for shelf and operational life estimations. Consequently, the accurate Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) articulation of components; enables aircraft maintenance repair and overhaul (MRO) engineers to schedule their maintenance plans in a pragmatic way. This automatically minimises the fixed costs incurred by aircrafts during maintenance repair and overhauls schedules.

The use of modern non-destructive testing techniques, such as atomic absorption rate analysis and modelling of product deterioration graphs based on factors like excessive aircraft vibrations, temperature extremities, stress and strain, have advanced considerably. Accordingly, data on component failures is interpreted using AI models, which can determine whether an extension to component life can be granted to an assembly or sub-assembly. This approach reduces the bottom line of aircraft operating companies by enabling them to make the most of the, remaining useful life of a component without prematurely discarding it; thereby increasing profitability.

This is where a significant business opportunity lies for Indian engineers and scientists. They can establish aviation sub-assembly test benches to evaluate the residual life of equipment, thereby reducing costs. This presents a never-ending stream of revenue generation and business opportunities, especially for the pre used component market.

Turbulence is another operating cost enhancer. It refers to atmospheric disruptions in terms of wind speed, direction, temperature, humidity, cloud cover, etc. Usually, it is the meteorological department that studies the current weather parameters, correlates them with past data and applies climate models to predict turbulence in a given spatial dimension in the foreseeable future. It’s worth noting that the first supercomputer Cray and India’s Param were used for meteorological predictions.

Today, with advancements in artificial intelligence and big data management generated through an increasing number of ground weather stations, aircraft capturing relevant atmospheric data while flying on a real time basis, satellite imagery and the use of radiosondes have improved turbulence prediction significantly.

The key point here is that all these sensors whether flying or stationary, are generating real-time, fast, and large amounts of data, which is instantly transmitted to ground stations using high-power broadband digital communication. Ground based computers run software to process this data and generate near-real-time turbulence predictions in three dimensions. This data is then beamed back to the operational control centres of airlines or directly to the pilots.

The pilots can use this information to make calculated decisions regarding potential deviations from the flight path to avoid turbulence and ensure passenger safety. It’s important to note that if the deviation from the flight itinerary due to turbulence is large, fuel consumption and flight time increases. This impacts the operational costs and profitability.

Because the predicted turbulence cuboid, created through real-time data analysis, shows varying intensity from its core to the fringes, flight engineers can make informed decisions as to how much deviation is necessary to balance safety with cost overruns. This critical decision cannot be left entirely to computers. It requires human discretion and experience who run quantitative tools like Maximising and Minimising equations to find optimal parameters. This is equation-based application is taught in B Com (H) and MBA curricula in India

In turbulent zones, an aircraft tends to buffet up and down. Consequently, flight attendants, who are often serving passengers at such times, may be at risk as also some passengers, who despite warnings, refuse to fasten their seat-belts. If the aircraft encounters significant turbulence, the aircraft buffeting may throw passengers off their seats. This causes injuries and trauma to revenue-generating passengers which may impact the airlines goodwill, safety record and bottom and top lines as enumerated subsequently.

The turbulence related flight path changes not only increase the operational costs of the flight, but the airline may also need to spend on compensation for stress management, medical expenses and passenger injuries. Such delays also force it’s public relations machinery into overdrive to salvage the image of an airline that has caused human injuries and experienced delays in landing slots. Such delays can affect the subsequent itineraries of passengers who want to take other flights.

Moreover, it is likely that an aircraft facing significant disruptions may not be assigned the scheduled and economically favoured landing slot and docking site at cargo terminals which are equipped with air bridges and vestibules for passenger disembarkation. This adds to unforeseen expenses for the airline.

Usually, turbulence data is provided by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and other agencies to airlines. Turbulence estimation presents an economic opportunity for Indian companies by leveraging our IT industry, captured meteorological data, fast data communications and our extensive computing capacity to sell meteorological advisories for aircrafts operating within our airspace or even globally.

Entrepreneurial companies could also sell this data to visiting airlines operating in India and generate valuable foreign exchange. This could potentially become a significant revenue stream for the Indian economy as it strives to achieve the trillion dollar mark once these services are scaled up.

Human beings are generally well behaved. However, there are always some outliers to this statement. These individuals may include disruptive passengers who usurp other passengers’ legroom, engage in sexual harassment or inappropriate touching due to close proximity. Then there are fliers, who constantly get up to walk on the aisle and disturb others, or those who create food-related arguments. Additionally, issues such as liquor intolerance, air travel fears, or claustrophobia manifest disruptive behaviours in some passengers which is a nuisance.

In such cases, these individuals may occasionally harass fellow passengers or even engage in altercations with the airline crew or other passengers. This necessitates restraint by Air Marshals and even premature deviations from the planned itinerary to offload the disruptive passenger, involve the police and incur associated legal costs.

Moreover, in today’s digital world, it’s common for bystanders to record such incidents on their mobile phones and share with friends as soon as they land. In these scenarios, the airline’s corporate communication team perforce, goes into overdrive for damage control. This may include offering compensation to the aggrieved parties. All these factors ultimately increase the operational costs for the airline and eat into their net profits.

Such costs and vulnerabilities cannot be eliminated, but the use of social media analytics and neuroscience-based algorithms developed with psychologist’s insights gleaned from the social signatures left by potential passengers on the internet, can help in creating individual risk profiles of flyers. By analysing the social media activity of individuals, airlines can better understand and categorise potentially risky passengers.

This is not difficult because most people today love to maintain a digital presence across various platforms in audiovisual or textual modes. They often showcase their existence and activities on social media. This way individuals unknowingly disclose their personality traits, which can be analysed by trained professionals.

While the current level of data analytics and behaviour modelling is not highly advanced, still, outliers or trouble makers can be identified with a considerable degree of certainty. Airlines can take proactive measures, by designating certain individuals as banned flyers or charging higher ticket prices to cover the costs of additional security measures like deploying air marshals and other resources needed to manage potential disruptions caused by such passengers.

It is important to note that increasing ticket prices will not necessarily deter the disruptive behaviour, but some costs associated with disciplining and public relations efforts incurred to manage such people can be recouped through this process. Additionally, segregated aircraft seating arrangements can be structured to minimise the potential of flight disruptions caused by unruly passengers.

It’s a well-known fact that criminals are more likely to commit crimes if they believe that they can get away with it. However, if there is active surveillance and engagement by air marshals inflight and by the security staff at the airport, then; there is a possibility that a potentially disruptive individual may refrain from misbehaving. In such cases, the airline can not only ensure a smoother flight experience for others but also earn additional revenue from the disruptive outliers.

The idea of placing trouble creators on a non-flying list is a legitimate approach of managing passengers with dubious behavioural characteristics. This measure helps in reducing airport and flight disruptions caused by such individuals.

The digital era in aviation safety has indeed come of age. It offers solutions to reduce operating costs by minimising vulnerabilities. This includes creating a financial matrix-based comparison of turbulence related detours, estimating the residual life of aircraft assemblies, as well as predicting deviant human behaviour. These facets are then compared to the anticipated losses due to the activation of the aforementioned flight disrupting factors and economically or socially beneficial decisions are arrived at.

The implementation of the aforesaid of digital transformation ie capturing and utilising big data, integrating sensors, fast computing and reliable broadband communication enables risks to be minimised against unforeseen events that may impact an airline’s profitability. While these costs cannot be entirely eliminated, they can certainly be minimised.

Italy-India Business, Science and Technology Forum 2025

By: Suman Sharma

Italy-India Business, Science and Technology Forum 2025: source Author

Innovation, AI, super computers, space technology, defence are a few sectors which dominated the Italy-India Business, Science and Technology Forum held on April 11, 2025 in New Delhi, which showcased the potential for joint partnerships between both countries with an aim to attract investments in these areas.

Antonio Tajani, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs & International Cooperation of Italy said that this forum is part of the strategic partnership plan signed by both the governments. “India is an important country for stability in the Indo-Pacific region. Stability is crucial to strengthen the trade,” he emphasized.

Addressing the forum, Mr. Tajani stated that India is an economy with enormous potential, and we want to strengthen this cooperation. “Italy and India are natural economic partners. Together we want to strengthen our cooperation for a partnership that looks at the future through higher education, innovation and research. Today, Italy and India are closer than ever. Our bilateral trade is over US$ 14 billion, and we want to invest more in India, export more to India, and attract more Indian investments in Italy,” he added.

India’s Minister of Commerce & Industry, Piyush Goyal, reiterated that the forum was an opportunity to collectively resolve to implement the Joint Strategic Action Plan 2025-29.

Meanwhile External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar, said that the direction of India’s progress and capabilities of Italian industry make for a good combination. “Make In India, today offers a platform or pathway for that collaboration to unfold,” he added. He further stated that India has been working with like-minded partners to build a resilient and trusted partnerships that we need now to address not only our economic but strategic priorities as well and for us, Italy ranks high in that list. Dr Jaishankar also added that there are natural complementarities in many sectors including energy, transport, food processing, light engineering which both nations need to exploit. “Italy has the technologies and best practices that could make such collaboration more fruitful,” he asserted.

Talking about the landmark initiative of ‘India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor’ (IMEC), Dr Jaishankar expressed hope that it will create a global access for economics, energy resources and communications. “India is not just growing, the nature of growth itself undergoing a shift,” he added. This is now a society focused on innovation and creativity where start-ups, AI, EVs, Drones, space and nano technologies are growing and will be the drivers of growth in future.

It may be noted that the Indian economy is slated to grow from US$ 4 trillion to US$ 30-35 trillion by 2047, which makes India’s goal of Viksit Bharat’ a compelling case to deepen the engagement between the European Union and India, particularly Italy and India. There are untapped newer areas like fashion, luxury goods, food processing, pharmaceuticals, tourism, green technology, advanced manufacturing, and automobiles, where collaboration is possible.

Launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Italian counterpart Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni in November 2024, the Joint Strategic Action Plan 2025-29 is considered a very forward-looking, ambitious and pragmatic roadmap with a strong focus on trade, investment and innovation.

Part of the Italian delegation, Anna Maria Bernini, Minister of Universities and Research of Italy said that Italy and India share a commitment to research and innovation, as well as to sustainable development and socio-economic transformation. “Both nations are implementing ambitious reforms and investments to advance their respective systems,” she added.

The recent geopolitical developments have underscored the global economy’s growing vulnerabilities and further fragmentation. The need to strengthen ties between like-minded economies like India and Italy has become the need of the hour.

The Cold Frontier: US-Denmark’s Rivalry over Greenland’s Future

By: Geehan Kooner

Greenland and US & Denmark’s flags: source Internet

Greenland, an unlikely geopolitical hotspot, is a quiet place remote behind its icy fjords. This vast island in the far north suddenly became a hot property, owing to Donald Trump’s statement in the US Congress, “We have to have Greenland, it is not a question of do you think we can do without it, we can’t”. The proposition by the United States to purchase Greenland was raised in 2019 as well, though ultimately unsuccessful, served as a stark illustration of the enduring strategic significance Washington places on the island.

Greenland, an island three times the size of Texas with a population of only 56,000, has historically been a quiet place. However, in recent years, as Arctic ice melts due to climate change, the island’s mineral wealth and potential new shipping routes have attracted the attention of major world powers. The U.S., Denmark, and even China and Russia have vested interests in Greenland’s future, leading to a renewed debate about its political status and security role.

Echoes of Empire: Greenland’s Danish Legacy

Inuit people have called Greenland home for thousands of years, with their culture deeply based in subsistence hunting and a strong connection to nature. Modern Danish colonization began in 1721, bringing Christianity, the Danish language, and European governance. Over the next two centuries, Danish rule imposed cultural and social changes that deeply affected the Inuit population. Families were separated, and traditional ways of life were disrupted, leaving a lasting legacy of trauma. Thus, Greenland has had some experience with land grabs.

Only after World War II, a slow process of decolonization started. In 1953, it became an official province of Denmark, and in 1979, it was granted home rule. Today, it is a semi-autonomous territory. It governs its own domestic affairs with Denmark still being responsible for security and foreign policy. Greenland has the right to declare full independence if it decides to do so in a referendum. And the government of Greenland says that is its goal. Even the Polls suggest a clear majority support. However, building the island’s economy is the biggest challenge on the way to independence. This is primarily the reason why Greenland has been looking for partners. It has representative offices in Iceland, the EU, the US and China. It has also signed cooperation agreements on mineral exploration with the US and the EU.  For Greenland, the US is an increasingly important business partner and has long guaranteed its security.

So, Trump’s interest could easily lead to a wider discussion about Greenland future away from Denmark. That is the reason why Denmark is seeking support from other European countries. It has been very clever on part of the Danish government to not make this an issue between the US and Denmark but between Europe and the US, because it is stronger together with the other European states.

U.S. Interest in Greenland: A Historical Perspective

The U.S. has long recognized Greenland’s strategic value. The cooperation between the US and Denmark on the island began during World War II, when Nazi Germany occupied Denmark, prompting the U.S. to establish military bases in Greenland to prevent a German invasion. The then Danish ambassador in Washington, Henrik Kauffmann agreed that the US should occupy Greenland and construct military bases on the island to prevent a German invasion. Greenland proved such a strategic asset, that in 1946, the US wanted to buy it from Denmark for a hundred million dollars in gold. The offer was rejected but both parties kept it secret at that time. Not long after both countries became founding members of NATO, Denmark agreed US troops should stay and in 1951, the two countries signed a Treaty on Common Defence of Greenland (1951 Greenland Defence Agreement) which is still in effect today.

Since the island is right between the US, Canada, the European Union and Russia and on the shortest route between the European part of Russia and the US, the US built here, with the permission of the Danish government, one of its most important radar stations at Pituffik.

The US facility was set up during the cold war to detect missile launches from the Soviet Union, and prepare to strike back. Today it remains the northernmost US military base in the world. Despite this significant US base, Greenland is actually a part of the Kingdom of Denmark. Denmark is a small European country of 6 million people. And its capital Copenhagen is further away from Greenland’s capital Nuuk, than Washington DC. Further, Denmark only has a light military footprint in Greenland, and only a few navy vessels monitor the shores.

“It is American power and not Danish power that provides security because the US base there is ultimately what’s guaranteeing their security and the Danes know that as well,” says Scott Barry Zellen (American researcher at University of Connecticut, specialising in arctic geopolitics). So, the fact that Greenland has a strategic role to play and a forward military presence for the US military, already means that they are part of the US security system.

Therefore, Trump’s 2019 proposition to buy Greenland was not new but echoed a long-lived U.S. interest in attaining ascendancy over the island. While Denmark dismissed the offer as absurd, the underlying motivations—security, economic potential, and geopolitical positioning—remain relevant today.

Military and Geopolitical Significance

Greenland’s geographical positioning between North America, Europe, and Russia endows it with strategic indispensability. The Arctic region is increasingly contested, with Russia expanding its Northern Fleet and China investing in Arctic infrastructure. Thus, surveillance is especially important between Greenland, Iceland and the UK, in this area between these three called the GIUK Gap. This naval chokepoint is a crucial part of NATO Strategy to detect and contain Russian ships, especially submarines moving between the Artic and the Atlantic.

Economic Potential: Rare Earth Minerals and Shipping Routes

Beyond its military relevance, Trump may also prize Greenland for another reason: its large and mainly untapped deposits of rare earth minerals, which are used in everything from cell phones to electric car batteries and at the moment China has a stranglehold on global supply.

However, Marc Jacobson, an expert on arctic security, says that it is important to remember that there is very little mining activity in Greenland. All these stories about Greenland riches in terms of mineral resources, are still far from the horizon. There are just two active mines in Greenland and only about a hundred people currently work in the Greenland mining sector. Exploration is very challenging. Mineral deposit site in the south of Greenland, Kvanefjeld, is said to be among the world’s top rare earth deposits outside China. But in 2021 the Greenland government stopped exploration there because the site also contains radioactive uranium and is close to populated areas. But it’s not just environmental concerns, extracting resources is a lot costlier here than in most other places. There are no roads linking Greenland settlements and the terrain is rough, with deep fjords, glaciers and icy mountain ranges.

Further, climate change is accelerating Arctic ice melt, opening up new shipping routes. Three of them in particular; the Northwest Passage through the top of the Canadian archipelago, the Northern Sea Route along Russia’s coast, and the transpolar route could significantly shorten maritime trade times between Asia, Europe, and North America. While these routes remain underdeveloped, they could transform global trade in the coming decades and reduce the dependency on the Suez Canal.

Greenland’s Path to Independence

Polls indicate that 85% of Greenlanders oppose becoming part of the U.S., but a majority support full independence from Denmark. The key challenge is economic sustainability. Denmark provides Greenland with an annual amount of about €500 million, nearly half its budget. Without this support, Greenland’s economy, currently dependent on fishing, would struggle.

Greenland is seeking alternative economic partnerships and has signed agreements on mineral exploration with Western powers, highlighting its intent to diversify economic opportunities. However, full independence would likely make Greenland more vulnerable to geopolitical competition among major powers.

Implications for the Future of Greenland

If Greenland were to gain independence and leave the security umbrella of NATO, it would undoubtedly make it  look and feel more vulnerable to Russian and Chinese influence but being owned by America won’t make Greenland safer, according to professor Klaus Dodds, an expert in arctic security. Experts fear that an American takeover would disregard Greenlandic culture and governance. The real security concern, however, is Trump-style rhetoric, which creates uncertainty, anxiety, fear and fuels tensions in an already contested region. Trump is talking about doing to Denmark what Putin is doing to Ukraine and what China wants to do to Taiwan. So, all that might be a transition to a new world order where Russia, China and the US might share the same strategic vision of spheres of influence being reestablished.

Greenland’s future is entangled in broader global power struggles. The U.S., Russia, and China have competing Arctic strategies, and Greenland may become a battleground for influence. Whether it remains part of Denmark, gains full independence, or falls under American control, Greenland’s geopolitical role is set to grow.

Greenland, once a remote and politically quiet territory, has emerged as a critical player in Arctic geopolitics. Its military significance, economic potential, and strategic location have drawn intense interest from the U.S., Denmark, and other global powers. While Greenlanders seek independence, economic and security concerns make the path uncertain. As the Arctic gain’s prominence in global affairs, Greenland will remain a key focal point in the evolving world order. So, the question which still remains unanswered is: In a world increasingly determined by the whims of great powers, will Greenlanders even get a say in determining their own future?

Major Narcotics Racket Bust: Joint Operations by the Indian Coast Guard & Gujarat ATS

0

By: Suman Sharma

Indian Coast Guard in an operation: source Internet

After last fortnight’s apprehension of a boat carrying illegally smuggled betel nuts, the Indian Coast Guard (ICG) recently busted a major narcotics racket on the high seas. In an overnight operation on 12-13 April 2025, the ICG undertook an intelligence based anti-narcotics operation at sea jointly with the Gujarat Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS). More than 300 kg of narcotics worth approximately Rs 1800 crore has been seized. The seized drugs are suspected to be methamphetamine.

The operation was a perfect example of inter-agency coordination wherein based on a corroborated input from Gujarat ATS, an ICG ship from the Coast Guard Region (West), which was on multi-mission deployment off North Maharashtra and South Gujarat area, diverted and intercepted an attempted transshipment in proximity of the International Maritime Boundary Line (IMBL) prior to being undertaken, thus leading to the successful operation.

Based on the credible intelligence input from the ATS, the ICG ship identified a suspect boat despite pitch darkness. On realising the approaching ICG ship, the suspect boat dumped its narcotics consignment in sea before it started fleeing towards the IMBL.

The alert ICG ship deployed its sea boat immediately for recovery of the jettisoned consignment whilst commencing a hot chase of the suspect boat.

The proximity of IMBL and the initial separation between the ICG ship and the boat at the time of its detection helped the perpetrator to evade interception before it crossed over the IMBL within a short time. The crossover resulted in termination of the hot chase and precluded the ICG ship to apprehend the suspect boat. Meanwhile the ICG team in sea-boat, after thorough search in the tough night conditions, recovered the sizeable amount narcotics that was dumped into sea.

The seized narcotics has been brought to Porbandar by the ICG ship for further investigations. The jointness of ICG and ATS, which has led to 13 such successful law enforcement operations in recent years reaffirms the synergy for national objective.

Last week, in a swift and well-coordinated maritime operation, the ICG successfully intercepted and apprehended Indian Fishing Boat (IFB)-‘Maa Basanti’ (Registration No: IND-WB-DS-MM-10023) approximately 72 nautical miles from Sagar Light, within the Indian Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).

Upon boarding and inspection, the vessel was found to be carrying approximately 400–450 gunny bags suspected of illegal smuggling of betel nuts, with each bag weighing an estimated 50 to 60 kilograms. The total weight of the consignment is currently under verification. A total of 14 crew members were present on board at the time of the apprehension.

Following standard procedures, Maa Basanti was escorted to Paradip Port by the ICG Ship. The vessel and its crew have been handed over to the Customs authorities for further investigation and necessary legal action.

This operation highlights the Indian Coast Guard’s continued vigilance and commitment towards safeguarding the nation’s maritime interests and preventing illegal activities within India’s maritime domain.

Feeding The War, Russia Turns U.S. Firm Into Military Supplier Even As U.S. Considers Peace Deal Exit

As the war in Ukraine drags into its fourth year with no end in sight, Moscow has moved to turn a seized American-owned food company into a supplier for its military, potentially derailing the fragile path toward a Russia-U.S. peace agreement.

According to the latest, Russia plans to utilize Glavprodukt – a canned food manufacturer previously owned by a Los Angeles-based entrepreneur – to support its national guard and defence ministry. The company was taken over by Russian authorities in October 2024 and is the only known American-owned business to have been placed under state control since the war began.

The move, seen by many as a provocative escalation, comes at a sensitive moment. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has warned that the United States may walk away from peace negotiations if tangible progress isn’t made imminently.

“We’re not going to continue with this endeavour for weeks and months on end,” Rubio said during a recent stop in Paris. “We need to determine very quickly—within days—whether or not this is doable.”

Rubio also confirmed that Glavprodukt’s expropriation would be part of broader conversations on resetting relations with Moscow.

War, Ukarine, Glavprodukt

Seized Assets, Strategic Purpose
Glavprodukt, once owned by Leonid Smirnov, a Russian-born American citizen, is now under the control of Russia’s federal property agency, Rosimushchestvo. A letter from Glavprodukt’s new management to the Russian prosecutor general, reviewed by Reuters, claims the seizure was critical to ensuring “stable production,” including for future use by Russia’s military apparatus.

Russian prosecutors have accused Smirnov of illegally transferring approximately 1.38 billion rubles ($17 million) out of the country between 2022 and 2024. The Moscow Arbitration Court formally seized Glavprodukt’s assets on March 12, and a hearing is scheduled for April 18. Smirnov has denied any wrongdoing, calling the move a “Russian-style corporate raid” aimed at expropriating his company.

Both the Russian prosecutor general’s office and the agencies overseeing the seizure have remained silent on the matter, despite requests for comment.

A Pattern of Strategic Seizures
Glavprodukt is not an isolated case. Over a dozen European firms, including Danish brewer Carlsberg and Finnish utility Fortum, have seen their Russian subsidiaries expropriated under presidential decrees. The Kremlin has warned that more such seizures could follow, especially as the war places increasing demands on domestic production and resource control.

When Russia first invaded Ukraine in early 2022, officials anticipated a swift operation. Instead, the prolonged conflict has drained national reserves and forced Moscow to increase defense spending while tightening its grip on industries critical to the war effort – including food production.

Who Gains?
The letter also sheds light on who stands to gain from Glavprodukt’s takeover. It states that Rosimushchestvo appointed the company’s new director at the behest of Druzhba Narodov, a food producer that served as the sole supplier to Russia’s national guard during 2019–2020.

Notably, Glavprodukt had never previously supplied the Russian military, raising questions about why it was selected now. Druzhba Narodov’s rise to prominence has a political history, according to a 2018 investigation by the late opposition figure Alexei Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Fund, then-Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev approved the company as the national guard’s exclusive supplier back in 2017.

Although current ownership records for Druzhba Narodov are now classified, a 2022 report by Kommersant revealed links to Agrocomplex named after N. I. Tkachev, an agricultural holding associated with former Russian agriculture minister Alexander Tkachev, who was sanctioned by the European Union in 2014 for his role in the annexation of Crimea. Tkachev is now listed as Agrocomplex’s board chairman, according to the holding’s 2025 audit filings.

Corporate filings and website data further reveal shared email domains between Druzhba Narodov and Agrocomplex, suggesting an enduring connection.

According to the company’s 2025 independent audit filings, the ultimate owner of the agricultural holding is Alexander Tkachev. A former Russian agriculture minister and close Kremlin ally, Tkachev was sanctioned by the European Union in 2014 for his support of Moscow’s annexation of Crimea. He later took the reins as chairman of the holding’s board, underscoring the deep ties between Russian state power and its strategic industries.

Marco Rubio sworn in as secretary of state, pledges decisions to make  America 'safer' and 'more prosperous' - ABC News

Meanwhile, diplomatic efforts to end the grinding war in Ukraine are approaching a breaking point.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned on Friday that President Donald Trump is prepared to abandon negotiations for a Russia-Ukraine peace deal within days if no tangible progress is made. Speaking in Paris following high-level meetings with European and Ukrainian leaders, Rubio was blunt.

While Trump remains interested in securing a deal, Rubio made it clear that patience is running thin in Washington. During his campaign, Trump vowed to end the war within 24 hours of taking office. However, that promise has since been tempered, with expectations shifting toward a resolution by April or May amid mounting obstacles.

Rubio’s remarks indicate growing frustration in the U.S. administration as global crises, from Ukraine to the Middle East, remain unresolved and the diplomatic clock ticks loudly.

As diplomatic doors narrow and military escalation continues, the fate of one seized American company may come to symbolize the broader breakdown, or breakthrough, of relations between Washington and Moscow. But for now, the message from both sides seems to be –  the window for compromise is closing fast.

Make The West Great Again, Meloni And Trump Just Lit A Fire That’s Giving Globalists Nightmares. But What Does This Mean Geopolitically?

The recent meeting between Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Donald Trump resulted in an unexpected alliance that is sending shockwaves. With one firm handshake and a now-iconic line, Meloni did not only introduce a populist slogan but she declared war on globalist orthodoxy. And make no mistake, the elites in Brussels, Davos, and D.C. heard it loud and clear.

Before the formalities of an Oval Office photo-op, Meloni sat down with President Donald Trump and key members of his cabinet, not to play games or pose for cameras, but to do what diplomats rarely do these days – talk substance. Trade, investment, and sovereign strength topped the agenda.

However, the media, ever the hungry hyenas sniffing for conflict, came bracing for fireworks, thinking – a tariff tussle, a transatlantic feud, something they could spin into headlines like “Trump vs. Europe, Round 27.” But what they got instead was a diplomatic curveball – clarity, calm, and confidence from Italy’s iron lady!

Giorgia Meloni, Donald Trump

Here are the questions posed in the neat little meeting and an analysis of geopolitical implications – 

When one reporter tried baiting her with the usual EU hysteria, asking if retaliatory tariffs were back on the table if no deal with Trump materialized—Meloni didn’t flinch. No hesitation, no spin.

“I am sure we can make a deal. I’m here to help on that. I cannot, look, deal in the name of the European Union.”

Not only did she defuse the question like a seasoned stateswoman, she subtly drew a line between her and the bureaucratic beast in Brussels. Meaning – don’t confuse me with the EU’s technocrats – I’m here to lead, not obey. Then came the diplomatic judo move that made headlines for all the right reasons – “My goal would be, invite President Trump to pay a visit to Italy and understand if there’s a possibility when he comes to organize also such a meeting with Europe.”

Was this just an invite, yes, but also an invitation with a warning –  the old Europe of timid consensus is crumbling, and a new Western nationalism is rising from Rome to Washington.

Meloni’s strategy was refreshingly simple- ditch the posturing, skip the ideological traps, and speak directly about mutual interests. No double-speak. No bureaucratic babble. Just straight talk. “I think the best way is that we simply speak frankly about the needs that every one of us has, and find ourselves in the middle—that’s useful for all.”

And when asked to define her politics, she didn’t take the bait of political labels or left-right tribalism. “Somebody calls me such a ‘Western nationalism,’ I don’t know if it is the right words, but I’m sure that together we are stronger.” Together. Not in submission to some bloated EU dream, but through sovereign unity between allies who still believe in the foundational values of the West.

“I’m here to find the best way to make us both stronger on both sides of the Atlantic.”

And just like that, the mood shifted. The media smelled smoke, but couldn’t find the fire. Meloni had outmaneuvered them.

Trump In Awe

When the two leaders finally emerged from their working lunch for the traditional Oval Office appearance, something rare happened, Trump, never known for doling out hollow praise, went full throttle in admiration.

“She has taken Europe by storm. It’s an honor to have the prime minister of Italy with us. Prime Minister Meloni, who’s doing a fantastic job. Everybody loves her and respects her, and I can’t say that about many people. She’s become a friend, and we really have a great relationship between Italy and ourselves.”

This wasn’t empty flattery. It was recognition of a fellow disruptor, a kindred spirit in a world obsessed with uniformity and control. No teleprompter. No rehearsed lines. Just raw, unfiltered respect, suggesting this wasn’t politics as usual. This was strength meeting strength – two leaders on a mission to restore power back where it belongs- with the people.

Trump softens stance on EU after Giorgia Meloni meet: Trade deal 100%  possible

“Make the West Great Again”

What we saw in Washington was neither diplomacy, performative press statements nor another round of lifeless protocol. It was raw political chemistry and it was the moment Giorgia Meloni blew up the media’s favorite headline – that Trump is some isolationist renegade turning his back on Europe and torching old alliances.

Seated beside him, in the symbolic heart of American power, Meloni calmly and unapologetically aligned herself with Trump, on everything from migration to energy, sovereignty to cultural preservation. If the European technocrats back home were watching, they must have felt the floor shift beneath them.

“We both share another fight, which is the fight against woke and DEI ideology that would like to erase our history.”

One sentence. One cultural grenade lobbed right into the globalist agenda. And she wasn’t done.

“We share lots of things on tackling illegal migration. On fighting against synthetic drugs. You know Italy has been one of the nations that made a plan against fentanyl, for example.”

Could this be a policy pact? Unofficial but unmistakably real; from fentanyl to border control, from defending Western values to defying left-wing orthodoxy, Meloni and Trump were locking arms in a common cause. And crucially, she made it clear: this isn’t a flirtation. This is a movement.

Trade Partners

“We have been talking about many bilateral topics and things that we can do together—about defense, about the economy, about space, about energy. Italian enterprises will invest, as they’ve been doing for many years… in the next year, I think around $10 billion.”

Even on trade and investment, the plans weren’t theoretical but already in motion. Two sovereign nations, one shared vision and then came the mic drop – the moment that will likely define not only their alliance, but an entire ideological realignment.

“The goal for me is to ‘Make the West Great Again. When I speak about West, mainly I don’t speak about a geographical space,” she explained. “I speak about a civilization. And I want to make that civilization stronger.”

Yes, she said it. Clearly. Deliberately. Echoing Trump’s most iconic slogan, but scaling it beyond borders, past walls, past parties, past political tribes.

You could almost hear the squirming in Brussels, in Berlin, and in the op-ed desks of The New York Times. Because Meloni wasn’t just endorsing Trump, she was doubling down on the very thing global elites have spent the past decade trying to dismantle – Western pride, Western unity, and the unapologetic defense of Western civilization.

She didn’t paper over the growing rift between the U.S. and Europe. She acknowledged it. And she offered a bridge. It was a diplomatic carrot dangled with perfect populist poise. You want in? Then start acting like you’re part of the team again.

But of course, the media couldn’t let the moment breathe. They pounced.

A reporter threw out a baited question, accusing Trump of once calling Europeans “parasites.” It was a desperate attempt to inject scandal into a moment of unity.

Meloni didn’t flinch. “He’s never said that.” Game Over!

It was a textbook tag-team takedown of media spin in real time. A leader deflecting falsehoods. Another leader backing him up without blinking. No script. No handlers. Just brutal political instinct.

And just like that, the meeting ended not in scandal, not in friction, but in a quiet, confident optimism. The message was clear, and it couldn’t have been more sharply drawn – the pendulum is swinging back.

On immigration.
On sovereignty.
On Western identity.

She came to reframe the West.

Giorgia Meloni bolsters ties with Trump world

So what does the meeting mean geopolitically?

The meeting between Donald Trump and Giorgia Meloni – what unfolded, was a redrawing of the Western map.

For decades, the political center of gravity in the West has been pulled by two poles – Washington and Brussels. But now, a third force is emerging – a sovereignist axis anchored by unapologetically nationalist leaders who are done being managed, lectured, or compromised.

Meloni has become the unexpected linchpin between Trump-style populism and European discontent. She is carving out a space where conservative values, border control, energy independence, and cultural preservation are not sins, but strategic imperatives.

Together, Trump and Meloni are writing the doctrine for what may become a broader transatlantic realignment. And here’s what that future might look like –

On Immigration: No more quotas. No more blind acceptance. The border is back. Sovereignty matters. And countries that refuse to protect their citizens’ security and identity will find themselves on the wrong side of history.

On Globalism: The age of unelected elites dictating domestic policy is coming to an end. Brussels-style bureaucracy and technocratic overreach are now open targets, not sacred institutions.

On Energy & Trade: Expect a pivot away from dependence on unstable regimes and a renewed focus on bilateral energy partnerships built not on carbon virtue-signaling but on hard security and mutual benefit.

On Cultural Identity: Western civilization is no longer something to apologize for. It’s something to defend. And that defense doesn’t mean war, it means rejecting the ideological project that seeks to erase history, religion, tradition, and borders.

Their message is simple –  the West is not dying. But if it wants to survive, it has to fight to live. And that fight has now begun!

Unexploded Ordnance in Azerbaijan: An Analysis

0

By: Gayathri Pramod, Research Analyst, GSDN

Mine clearance in Azerbaijan: source Internet

Unexploded ordnance (UXO) in Azerbaijan, a persistent and hazardous legacy of armed conflict, demands urgent attention and international cooperation. The aftermath of the protracted Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has left these remnants of war posing an immediate danger to civilian life and severely hindering socio-economic development, the safe return of displaced populations, and post-conflict reconstruction. This analysis delves into the nature, scope, and implications of UXO in Azerbaijan, highlighting the systemic challenges associated with their clearance and the broader geopolitical context that continues to shape the UXO landscape in the region. The presence of UXO in Azerbaijan is intricately tied to the historical and political tensions surrounding the Nagorno-Karabakh region, which have led to a clear victory for Azerbaijan.

The armed confrontations between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces, particularly during the intense periods of conflict in the early 1990s and again in 2020, resulted in widespread deployment of various forms of military ordnance, including cluster munitions, artillery shells, landmines, and rockets. Many of these devices failed to detonate upon impact and remain buried or hidden across extensive areas, particularly in formerly occupied territories that have since returned to Azerbaijani control. The resurgence of conflict in 2020 significantly expanded the geographic scope of UXO contamination, extending the risk into new zones and complicating the already daunting task of clearance, which had a direct effect on the lives of civilians. These military piles and stocks are very hazardous for humans and the environment. UXOs are particularly insidious.

These include bombs, grenades, and munitions that failed to detonate as intended. Some are found years later, still lethal and hazardous. In one instance in Mardakert in the early 2000s, a downed helicopter left behind air-to-surface missiles and operational guns lying scattered in an open field. In another tragic case, a young boy named Artak Beglaryan—who would later become a prominent public figure—lost his sight after mistaking an unexploded bomblet for a toy. These stories are not rare; they are the reality of life in formerly contested areas. Since the 2020 ceasefire, reports of civilian casualties have persisted. The International Crisis Group recently noted that over 50 Azerbaijanis have been killed and nearly 300 injured due to mines and UXO. Often unaware of the risks, children are particularly vulnerable, prompting governments and international organizations to ramp up educational campaigns in schools near contaminated zones. The scale of UXO contamination is both vast and multifaceted. In many liberated districts such as Fuzuli, Jabrayil, and Aghdam, entire areas remain inaccessible due to the threat of unexploded ordnance. This widespread presence obstructs resettlement programs and delays critical infrastructure projects such as rebuilding roads, schools, and utilities. Moreover, the contamination of agricultural lands with UXO is particularly devastating for Azerbaijan, a country where agriculture plays a crucial role in local livelihoods and national economic output. Farmers cannot cultivate land without risking their lives, and the resulting economic paralysis affects food security and the broader process of rural revitalization.

The scale of problems in Azerbaijan

The human cost of unexploded ordnance is beyond stating. According to Landmine Monitor, Azerbaijan remains one of the most heavily mine-contaminated countries, with an estimated 1.5 million landmines posing a threat to over 13% of its territory. Since 1991, Armenian military forces have extensively planted mines within Azerbaijani territory—including Karabakh, a region now an integral part of Azerbaijan, and seven adjacent districts—both during the occupation and aftermath of the Second Karabakh War in September-November 2020, throughout the post-conflict period. Since the end of the war in November 2020, 392 Azerbaijani civilians have been killed or seriously injured, despite the country immediately launching extensive humanitarian demining operations. Dozens of civilians, including children, have been killed or maimed since the end of active hostilities, often while returning to inspect or reclaim their homes. In total, over 3,400 Azerbaijanis have been victims of mines since the conflict began in 1991 – including 359 children and 38 women. UXO-related incidents have also affected demining personnel, underscoring the extreme risks faced even by trained professionals. This continuing toll on human life reflects the enduring threat that UXOs pose, even in the absence of active conflict. It also points to immediate and sustained investment in public education campaigns to raise awareness among returning residents and continued international funding and expertise to support clearance and victim assistance programs.

The issue of UXO in Azerbaijan has become a deeply entrenched humanitarian concern, particularly as thousands of internally displaced persons (IDPs) make their way back to their former homes in regions surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh. These lands, once ravaged by war, now hold hidden dangers beneath their surface—remnants of decades of conflict in the form of landmines and UXO that continue to claim lives and limbs. The problem is not new, but the urgency is heightened by the sheer number of people returning to rebuild their lives. In the years since the 2020 ceasefire agreement, Azerbaijan has undertaken significant efforts to address this threat. Vugar Suleymanov, who heads the Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA), reported that over 111,000 hectares of contaminated land had been cleared in just three years. These efforts have uncovered and safely removed more than 30,000 anti-personnel mines, around 18,000 anti-tank mines, and over 60,000 pieces of unexploded ordnance. While these numbers reflect impressive progress, they also hint at the scale of the problem—it is immense, and the road ahead remains long and dangerous. The mine contamination is not just a recent by-product of the latest war. Mines and UXO have been buried across the region since the first Karabakh conflict in the early 1990s. Their placement records are often missing, inaccurate, or deliberately withheld, and their after-effects remain. 

Recently, the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA) warned Azerbaijani citizens, urging them to be extremely cautious when encountering mines, unexploded military ordinances, or unknown objects. According to Azernews, the Ministry’s statement emphasizes avoiding contact with potentially dangerous items. The public is advised not to touch or handle mines, unexploded ordnance, or any unfamiliar objects that may pose a threat. The warning advises against entering dangerous areas and urges people not to intervene with discarded munitions. The statement further advises, “Do not touch mines, unexploded military ordnance, or unknown objects, and do not pick them up. Never attempt to interfere with them to protect your life.” While the international spotlight often focuses on political developments, the human cost of landmines and unexploded ordnance continues to mount quietly. For example, thousands of hectares of farmland remain unusable in the Tavush region of Armenia due to mines. Efforts to address the problem have included establishing a U.S.-funded demining center in Etchmiadzin, which focused on training local teams, though border-adjacent defensive minefields were notably excluded from clearance plans. Unfortunately, mine action has often been politicized. Accusations have been levelled against demining organizations, including the HALO Trust, not necessarily for what they have done but because of how politically sensitive mine clearance has become. This underscores the need for international cooperation and the importance of global solidarity in dealing with the legacy of war.

Given the devastating impact and widespread presence of landmines, Azerbaijan has prioritized humanitarian demining efforts in the Karabakh and East Zangezur regions. Although international partners support these efforts, more assistance is urgently needed. To date, approximately 185,707 hectares of land have been cleared by the Mine Action Agency of Azerbaijan (ANAMA) and other operators. These operations have led to the successful detection and neutralization of 181,148 explosive devices, including 36,103 anti-personnel mines, 21,457 anti-tank mines, and 123,376 unexploded ordnances (UXOs). Landmine clearance is an inherently complex and lengthy process. However, Azerbaijan has mobilized its national resources and invested in modern technologies to improve the efficiency of mine action. Despite these significant efforts, international support remains insufficient. Currently, the Azerbaijani government finances approximately 95% of all demining operations. While contributions from international organizations and partner countries such as KS relief, NSPA, MLI, Roots of Peace, ARMAC, and MAG are valuable, they fall short of meeting the full scale of the challenge. Azerbaijan continues to call for more substantial political and practical support from the international community to address the humanitarian consequences of landmines and accelerate the clearance of affected areas.

Landmines also continue to serve as a significant impediment to the return of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and the reconstruction of infrastructure. Despite Azerbaijan’s repeated appeals to Armenia, both before and after the 44-day Patriotic War, to provide accurate landmine maps, Armenia initially denied the existence of such maps. Only under international pressure did Armenia eventually provide limited information, which covered only a tiny portion of the mined areas and proved to be only 25% accurate. Over 55% of recent landmine incidents have occurred in areas not covered by these maps. Furthermore, while Armenia’s maps claimed that approximately 400,000 landmines had been planted in Azerbaijani territory, the actual number is believed to be closer to 1.5 million. The provision of accurate and comprehensive maps of all landmine-contaminated sites is essential to ensuring the safe return of IDPs and facilitating reconstruction in the affected regions. Since 2022, more than 10,000 former IDPs have returned to 10 settlements in the Karabakh and East Zangezur regions. Around 30,000 people live and work in these areas, contributing to key sectors such as construction, governance, and industry. By the end of 2025, the number of resettled communities is expected to increase to 30. The Azerbaijani government has undertaken significant initiatives to support the development of these regions, with a focus on creating employment opportunities, fostering sustainable regional development, and ensuring dignified living conditions.

The government is constructing modern housing, developing infrastructure, and providing essential services to support these goals. Economic programs are also being launched to stimulate local business development and agriculture. These comprehensive efforts aim to ensure that the people returning to Karabakh and East Zangezur can live in a safe, stable, and prosperous environment. Additionally, Karabakh and East Zangezur have been designated green energy zones. Since the end of the 44-day Patriotic War in 2020, Azerbaijan has made substantial investments in hydro energy, with 270 megawatts of hydroelectric power already operational within four years. The continued presence of landmines in Azerbaijan poses a serious security threat and remains a significant obstacle to peace, reconciliation, and sustainable development. On the international front, Azerbaijan has actively raised awareness about the serious landmine threat in Karabakh and East Zangezur.

In 2023, the country formally recognized humanitarian demining as its 18th National Sustainable Development Goal and began advocating for its adoption as the 18th Global Sustainable Development Goal by the United Nations. Azerbaijan also proposed the establishment of a Special Contact Group on Humanitarian Demining within the Non-Aligned Movement, which became operational in September 2023. That same year, Azerbaijan led a resolution at the 15th meeting of the state’s parties to the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. The resolution, titled “The Impact of Mines on Cultural Heritage,” addressed the devastating effects of landmines on cultural sites. In another significant step forward, in May 2024, the Mine Action Agency of Azerbaijan (ANAMA) and the United Nations Development Programme signed a letter of intent to establish a “Centre of Excellence” focused on mine action education. This new centre will enable Azerbaijan to share its expertise with other countries facing similar challenges. Most recently, on April 4, 2025, the Permanent Mission of Azerbaijan to the United Nations and the Centre of Analysis of International Relations (AIR Centre), a leading Baku-based think tank on foreign and security policy, co-organized a high-level discussion at the UN Headquarters in New York. The event, “Saving Lives Through Humanitarian Mine Action in Azerbaijan,” was held in observance of the International Day for Mine Awareness and Assistance in Mine Action. It brought together key stakeholders in the field to address the humanitarian impact of landmines and explosive remnants of war in Azerbaijan, reaffirming the country’s commitment to tackling the global landmine crisis.

Azerbaijan’s global outreach activities

Beyond the humanitarian and developmental dimensions, the UXO issue in Azerbaijan also carries strategic and political implications. The extent to which the Azerbaijani government can effectively manage UXO clearance operations is closely tied to its broader goals of consolidating control over recaptured territories and projecting an image of stability and state capacity. At the same time, failing to clear these areas fully or do so quickly could fuel domestic frustration or undermine efforts at reconciliation and reintegration. The region is not an easy task; moreover, the presence of UXOs can be used as a political tool in narratives of victimhood and legitimacy, with both Armenia and Azerbaijan accusing each other of deploying prohibited weapons or failing to cooperate in humanitarian demining. More recently, even the exchange of minefield maps has been caught up in political bargaining, such as when Armenia reportedly traded such data to release detained individuals. However, it was not always this way. In the early 2000s, efforts were made to bridge divides through joint mine clearance training programs involving Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia under U.S.-led initiatives. These Confidence and Security Building Measures were a testament to what could be achieved with cooperation. There is hope that such cooperation might return.

Experts like Hafiz Safikhanov in Baku have suggested that similar initiatives are still possible. However, meaningful collaboration likely hinges on the resolution of deeper political disputes. Perhaps most critically, the region could consider joining the Ottawa Treaty, which seeks to eliminate the use of anti-personnel mines. For that to happen, however, the war of words must end and be replaced by a commitment to saving lives and ensuring a safer future. Until then, the fields of Azerbaijan—silent, green, and often deadly—will continue to bear witness to a past that refuses to be buried.

International law also intersects with the UXO challenge in significant ways. The use of certain types of ordnance, such as cluster munitions, has drawn criticism from human rights organizations and may contravene international humanitarian norms, particularly when such weapons are used in civilian-populated areas. While neither Azerbaijan nor Armenia is a party to the Convention on Cluster Munitions, the growing global consensus against the use of such weapons places moral and diplomatic pressure on both sides.

In this context, Azerbaijan’s UXO clearance efforts are not just technical operations but also carry implications for its international image and relationships, especially with donor countries and institutions concerned with post-conflict rehabilitation. Efforts to address the UXO problem in Azerbaijan have been both concerted and ongoing, yet remain challenged by the scale of the issue and the complexity of the terrain. The Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA) has been at the forefront of clearance operations, supported by international partners, including the United Nations Development Programme and various NGOs. Despite significant progress, the sheer density of contamination and the lack of accurate mapping from previous decades of conflict make the task extremely arduous. Additionally, the use of cluster munitions during the 2020 conflict — which scatter multiple smaller sub-munitions over a wide area — has introduced a more unpredictable pattern of UXO dispersal, complicating the technical and logistical aspects of demining operations.

The future trajectory of UXO management in Azerbaijan will depend on several interrelated factors. These include the sustained commitment of government resources, the availability of international support, technological innovation in demining practices, and the overall political climate between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Advances in remote sensing, artificial intelligence, and drone-based surveying hold promise for enhancing the efficiency of clearance operations, but such technologies require significant investment and training. Additionally, peacebuilding and regional diplomacy progress could open new avenues for collaborative approaches to UXO clearance, although mutual distrust and unresolved grievances continue to pose serious obstacles.

In conclusion, unexploded ordnance in Azerbaijan represents a multifaceted challenge with far-reaching implications for human security, economic recovery, and political stability. While efforts at clearance and risk mitigation are ongoing, the problem remains deeply embedded in the region’s historical, technical, and geopolitical fabric. Addressing this issue comprehensively will require continued operational focus and a broader strategy that integrates humanitarian, developmental, and diplomatic dimensions. Until then, UXO will continue to cast a long shadow over Azerbaijan’s post-conflict recovery and its aspirations for lasting peace and development.

From Battlefield To Orbit In 2025, Why Europe’s Defence Sector Is Betting Big On Space?

In a world where wars are no longer just fought on land, sea, or in the air, Europe’s defence sector is beginning to see the final frontier – space – as the next strategic battleground. With the return of war to European soil, a rising tide of anti-satellite threats, and the increasing militarisation of space by global superpowers, traditional defence companies are now aggressively venturing into orbital territory.

This is not just a symbolic shift. What was once a domain dominated by civilian projects, communications satellites, Earth observation, GPS, has now become critical for strategic autonomy and national security. From Austria to France, from Sweden to Italy, defence players are launching space divisions, dusting off legacy aerospace ambitions, and aligning with broader geopolitical imperatives.

From Civilian to Defence Sector In Space

While the relationship between space and defence is not new, the lines between civilian and military applications were, until recently, clearly drawn. That distinction is now blurring. As the Vienna-based European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) notes, many of today’s leading European space companies are either offshoots of defence conglomerates or embedded within them. But after a lull in the early 2000s, the last three years have witnessed a sharp uptick in defence-led space activities.

According to Matija Rencelj, research manager at ESPI, this shift began accelerating post-2022, with the war in Ukraine serving as a wake-up call. Space, once considered a domain of peaceful exploration, is now being reassessed as a pillar of Europe’s strategic autonomy. And yet, the gap between ambition and action remains painfully wide.

Defence Sector, Space, Europe

Investment Lag and Capability Gap
The EU currently spends just 0.07% of its GDP, approximately €14 billion annually, on space activities. Contrast that with the United States, China, or even India, and the disparity becomes sharp. Only 15% of Europe’s public space budget is allocated toward defence applications, compared to the global average of about 50%.

To close this capability gap, Rencelj estimates that Europe needs to ramp up investment to at least 0.15–0.25% of its GDP by 2040. But money alone won’t solve the problem. Fragmented national strategies and a lack of cohesive governance at the EU level have long hampered progress.

Christophe Grudler, French MEP and co-chair of the European Parliament’s intergroup on Sky and Space, stresses the need for a unified European approach. “Too many member states are currently working on separate national plans,” he says. “We need programmes designed, funded, and governed at the EU level.” In other words, without integration, Europe risks being outpaced and outclassed in the militarisation of space.

ESA, The Sleeping Giant?
Enter the European Space Agency (ESA), a 23-member consortium with the technical might to compete on a global scale but not yet the financial muscle. ESA’s Director General Josef Aschbacher has been sounding the alarm: Europe can do it, but only if it chooses to. “We have some of the best space engineers and scientists,” Aschbacher said, “and excellent companies of world standard.”

Currently operating on an €8 billion annual budget, roughly one-third of NASA’s and barely rivalling the U.S. Space Force’s spending, ESA has still managed impressive feats. In 2024 alone, ESA launched a record 13 satellites, inaugurated the Ariane 6 rocket, returned VEGA-C to flight, and trained a new batch of astronauts. But these achievements only scratch the surface of what’s needed if Europe wants to stand shoulder to shoulder with the world’s space superpowers.

There’s hope that the upcoming ESA Ministerial Conference in Bremen in November 2025 will mark a turning point. Budgets are expected to rise from €16.9 billion in 2022 to potentially €21 billion. But as Aschbacher points out, money is not the only concern but also about political will, long-term strategy, and vision.

Beyond Rockets. The Economic Case for Space
Critics often see space investment as wasteful, a playground for billionaire adventurers like Musk, Bezos, or Branson. But Aschbacher is quick to dispel the myth. “One euro invested in space brings back five euros to the economy,” he argues. That return manifests in job creation, technology spin-offs, private sector engagement, and even medical innovation.

Take Earth observation and weather forecasting satellites, for example. ESA’s Arctic Weather Satellite, launched recently, is expected to generate economic value fifty times its initial cost. And then there’s Vigil, an ambitious mission aimed at monitoring solar flares that threaten both satellites and Earth-based electrical grids. With a launch targeted for 2031 and a price tag of a few hundred million euros, Vigil is looking to safeguarding Europe’s digital infrastructure.

European Space Agency selects T-Systems as prime contractor

Time for a Unified Industrial Strategy
Grudler believes the time for fragmented ambition is over. He envisions space being placed on equal footing with semiconductors, energy, and artificial intelligence in Europe’s industrial policy. “We don’t need to copy the United States line by line,” he said, “but we do need political vision, unity, and continuity.”

That includes developing a true European procurement system for space, pooling resources across member states, and embedding space into the EU’s long-term industrial and defence strategy. Otherwise, Europe risks becoming a junior player in a domain where dominance translates directly to geopolitical leverage.

The Last Bit, Space Is Not Optional

Space is no longer a luxury, it is a necessity. As Aschbacher puts it: “You cannot live without space in 20 years.” Just as the internet transformed every aspect of modern life, space technology, from satellite communications and Earth observation to missile tracking and cybersecurity, will underpin the next era of global competition.

And Europe must decide – will it lead, or will it follow?

As ESA and EU institutions prepare for a pivotal 2025, the clock is ticking. The message from industry, policymakers, and scientists- the stars are calling, and Europe’s defence sector must rise to meet the challenge. Because in today’s geopolitical climate, space is not the final frontier, it is the next frontline.

China Denies, Ukraine Reveals. Why Ukraine Paraded Chinese POWs, The Hidden Message To Beijing And The Fear Gripping Young Russian Men As Russia Calls Largest Draft In Years

Ukraine seemed to be running out of diplomatic cards to play – with Donald Trump’s support on the global stage steadily declining and Russia ramping up its offensive, bolstered quietly by Beijing’s nod-and-wink diplomacy, and just then, Kyiv made its move.

After China flatly denied that any of its citizens were fighting alongside Russian forces in the ongoing war, Ukraine decided to up the ante. In a rare and controversial move, the Ukrainian military, with President Volodymyr Zelensky’s nod, paraded two Chinese nationals captured as prisoners of war before a sea of reporters and camera crews.

It was a direct and deliberate breach of international humanitarian law, which strictly prohibits exposing POWs to public curiosity or media attention. But Kyiv clearly felt the risk was worth the message –  Beijing was lying, and Ukraine had the proof.

Just last week, Zelensky publicly claimed that at least 155 Chinese nationals were actively fighting on Ukrainian soil, trained and deployed by Russia. He accused Moscow of dragging China into the conflict and slammed Beijing for staying conveniently silent. Two of those fighters, he said, had been captured in Donetsk. China, of course, rubbished the claims as fiction.

But the visual counterpunch from Ukraine was hard to ignore.

Flanked by Ukrainian security forces, the two POWs, dressed in combat fatigues and speaking Mandarin, were seated before journalists, with a translator by their side. Their stories clearly painted a  picture of desperation and deception.

One of the captured men recounted how he lost his job during the COVID-19 pandemic and was lured by the promise of 250,000 rubles a month (roughly $3,000) or more than double what he could earn back home. With a background in medical rehabilitation, he claimed he offered to assist Russia’s military in that capacity. But once in Moscow, the script flipped, he was forced into combat training with no clear understanding of what he’d signed up for.

Documents were all in Russian. Neither of the two said they spoke the language. Communication was reduced to gestures and guesswork. One of them said he often relied on hand signals to follow orders.

A separate military contract, allegedly signed by another Chinese volunteer and shown by Ukrainian intelligence, revealed the fine print: a one-year commitment to full combat duties, support during martial law, and participation in military activities, including those beyond Russian borders.

Once deployed to the battlefield, confusion reigned.

Recounting his final moments in the field, one of the Chinese fighters described the chaos that led to their capture in Donetsk.

“When we reached a forest, my captain just kept saying ‘Da, da, da’—yes, yes, yes in Russian—telling me to attack,” he said. “But I didn’t even know where the target was. We passed many Russian positions. I thought we were heading to our own bunker. I thought he was joking. So I hid. Then another Russian unit captain threw a grenade, and suddenly drones were everywhere.”

They surrendered shortly after. They had been on the battlefield for just three days.

Ukraine

China Faces The Sting

In response to Ukraine’s revelation of captured Chinese nationals fighting for Russia, China’s foreign ministry tried to save face with a quick rebuttal. “We would like to reiterate that China is not the initiator of the Ukrainian crisis, nor is China a participating party,” the statement read. “We urge the relevant parties to correctly and soberly understand China’s role and to refrain from releasing irresponsible remarks.”

But while Beijing deflects and distances itself from the war, Kyiv is taking the gloves off. While China continues to claim neutrality, its actions tell a different story. From the outset of the war, Beijing has provided Moscow with a steady stream of economic and diplomatic support. Now, with Chinese nationals confirmed to be on the frontlines, Kyiv is focused on how China is involved beyond the rhetoric and whether Beijing’s government might be complicit.

When asked whether this involvement could be part of China’s official policy, Zelensky was candid. “I don’t have an answer yet. The Security Service of Ukraine will investigate,” he said. However, he added, “We do believe Beijing is aware of what’s happening.”

The Role of Foreign Fighters in the War

Foreign fighters have become a significant part of this conflict, with volunteers from all corners of the world joining both sides. In 2024, a list reviewed revealed six Sri Lankans, seven Nepalese, and individuals from Somalia, Egypt, and Syria, among others, held by Ukraine as prisoners of war.

Even North Korea has sent an estimated 14,000 troops to aid Russia’s cause, with Kyiv capturing two North Korean soldiers in January alone.

Ukraine’s Defense Intelligence sources explain Russia’s reliance on these foreign recruits. “Russia is now stuck in a war of attrition,” said an intelligence source. “It can’t sustain the front lines with its own forces alone and has no choice but to recruit from everywhere.”

The Chinese prisoners were adamant, however, that their decision was personal. They claimed that slick recruitment videos on TikTok- circulating in China for over a year – were their main motivator. One of these videos shows Russian soldiers training in combat gear, alongside messages in both Russian and Chinese, detailing the financial incentives of joining Russia’s army.

The video, originally aimed at a domestic Russian audience, included Chinese subtitles, which seemed to appeal directly to young Chinese men. The footage, showing soldiers in action, emphasizing “manliness” and financial rewards, resonated in a country where military service is venerated but direct combat experience is often elusive.

Whether these videos were sanctioned by the Russian government or created by social media users remains unclear, but the allure of combat experience in exchange for money is undeniable, especially when advertised on platforms like TikTok, which is wildly popular among Chinese youth.

Chinese soldiers in Ukraine: Is Beijing sending troops to back Russia?

Why the Timing of Kyiv’s Move Matters

Kyiv has shown POWs to the press before – soldiers from Nepal, fighters from Africa – but its decision to spotlight captured Chinese nationals is a dramatic deviation from the norm. This wasn’t a random move. The timing is strategic, and the audience far beyond just the Ukrainian public.

At the heart of this move is Ukraine’s battle for relevance in Washington, particularly with President Donald Trump back in the Oval Office. His administration has so far struggled to rein in Moscow, with ceasefire talks hitting a dead end. And while Ukraine bleeds on the frontlines, Washington’s eyes seem fixated elsewhere, on China.

From Zelensky’s perspective, nothing is more potent than illustrating the possibility that China’s support for Russia may go beyond yuan and lip service. The optics of Chinese soldiers fighting alongside Russian troops is a message tailor-made for Trump’s administration, which has been slapping Beijing with escalating tariffs and treating it as America’s top global rival.

According to Anders Puck Nielsen of the Royal Danish Defence College, Kyiv is increasingly uneasy about the European Union’s warming overtures to China – as both global powers seek to find common ground amid a worsening trade climate fueled by U.S. tariffs.

“Suddenly it seems there might be potential for the Europeans and the Chinese to find common ground on other questions as well,” Nielsen said. Ukraine’s move, he added, is “clearly political,” aimed at ensuring China’s entanglement with Russia doesn’t get swept under Europe’s diplomatic carpet.

Beijing, predictably, was not amused. “We urge the relevant parties concerned to correctly and soberly understand the role of China and to not release irresponsible remarks,” snapped Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian – delivering a warning that didn’t name Kyiv, but left little ambiguity.

Russia’s Military Call-Up Raises Alarm Bells

Meanwhile, Moscow is quietly prepping for a long, grinding war, and it’s starting by replenishing its troops.

On April 1, Russia launched its largest conscription drive since 2011, aiming to draft 160,000 men between the ages of 18 and 30. The campaign is part of President Putin’s broader military expansion plan, targeting a 2.5 million-strong armed force.

The reaction was a wave of panic among Russian youth.

With more than 100,000 Russian soldiers already killed since 2022, according to an open-source tally by BBC and Mediazona, and the prospect of being sent to the front lines has terrified thousands of draft-eligible men. The widening age bracket hasn’t helped either: once capped at 27, the upper age limit for conscription now reaches 30.

And unlike the early months of the war, there are fewer cracks to slip through. Legal loopholes and exemptions still exist (on health grounds, through court appeals, by pursuing higher education, citing family responsibilities, or even applying for alternative civil service) but they are increasingly difficult to leverage. Those in certain sectors, such as the military-industrial complex, or high-ranking politicians, are usually spared. For everyone else it is fair game.

The tightening net has driven many to desperate measures – from feigning illness to leaving the country altogether.

For now, the Kremlin maintains that this is just a regular draft. But as the war drags on and losses mount, it’s clear this is a last-ditch attempt to keep the machine running.

Russia's Massive Army Recruitment Drive Appears to Deliver Few Soldiers -  The Moscow Times

And it’s happening just as Ukraine’s campaign to expose foreign fighters, especially from China, is heating up. As both sides fight their battles on and off the battlefield, the propaganda war is just as critical as the one being fought with bullets and drones.

In today’s hybrid war, optics matter as much as artillery, and Ukraine understands this all too well. Hence, by showcasing captured Chinese fighters, Kyiv isn’t just documenting the battlefield – it’s weaponizing perception, sending a calculated message to both Washington and Brussels: Russia’s war is not just Putin’s, and China’s fingerprints might be deeper than they claim.

The Last Bit 

As Ukraine tries to shore up global support and prevent geopolitical realignments that could weaken its standing, Russia is digging in for a long haul, arming itself not just with missiles, but with the bodies of frightened young conscripts.

From Washington’s shifting priorities to the EU’s careful diplomatic dance with Beijing, the global chessboard is moving rapidly.

 

 

 

 

Ads Blocker Image Powered by Code Help Pro

Ads Blocker Detected!!!

We have detected that you are using extensions to block ads. Please support us by disabling these ads blocker.

Powered By
Best Wordpress Adblock Detecting Plugin | CHP Adblock